WP4
To develop a modelling tool for predicting the environmental
response to waste inputs from marine cage farms production of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead sea bream
(Sparus auratus) in the
eastern Mediterranean
Objectives
- To review the models used in the prediction of environmental impacts
of marine cage farming, which have been developed in Norway, Scotland
and elsewhere
- To develop a model to predict the environmental response to waste
inputs from marine cage farms production of sea bass and gilthead sea
bream in the eastern Mediterranean
- To utilise the data obtained on the physical characterisations of a
wide range of farm sites to allow model parameterisation using both
real and synthetic current data sets
- To utilise the detailed environmental and faunal data obtained from
the selected farm sites to validate model predictions with real data
Existing models and their use
A modelling tool now exists for predicting the response of sediments
and their benthic macrofaunal assemblages to waste inputs from salmon cage
farms. This model (DEPOMOD) has established correlations between benthic
indices and predicted waste deposition and accumulation and is now being
used in the environmental control of salmonid farms in Scotland
How will the existing model be developed?
A similar model will be developed for use in predicting fish farm
effects in the oligotrophic waters of the Eastern Mediterranean. Since
fish farming in these areas causes qualitatively and quantitatively
different impacts both on the water column and benthos compared to
Atlantic Europe, the model requires specific customisation of existing
management practices and major re-parameterisation of predictive modules.
The existing model needs to be developed in the following areas:
- a validated component which models losses of waste particles to wild
fish feeding needs to be added
- measurements of settling velocities of feed and faecal particles
common to fish farmed in the Mediterranean for use in the model
- inclusion of temperature in the model where necessary to model fish
growth and other factors such as degradation of solids
discharged
- establish correlations between solids accumulation and benthic
response for several sites with sensitivity analyses
What are the deliverables?
A predictive model to assess the environmental impact of marine fish
cage farms in the Eastern Mediterranean.
The model output would provide predictions of:
- the area of sediment around the cages affected by solids
deposition
- the expected response of the benthic macrofauna to varying levels of
solids deposition
- the probable response of wild fish populations to varying captive
fish production levels
Each component of the model will be validated independently so that the
overall model performs reliably. The final model software will be a
WindowsTM user friendly menu driven application with model documentation
and user manual.
Background information on the existing model - input data
A flow diagram detailing the existing model DEPOMOD is
shown below:

- current velocity measurements for an area close to the fish farm
with measurements at different depths in the water column
- horizontal and vertical dispersion coefficients for the area
- bathymetry, numbers, dimensions and positions of cages
For the stage of the growing cycle to be modelled:
- feed input data (kg feed d-1 for the whole farm) and mean fish
size
- water content and digestibility of the feed
- food and faecal settling velocity data
Background information
on the existing model - predictions
This plot to the right shows the predicted solids deposition (g solids
m-2 bed yr-1) for a fish farm (cages indicated by squares).
Although these results are for a particular stage of the growing cycle,
different scenarios can easily be tested with the model
Established relationships between predicted solids
accumulation (x-axis) and a benthic response (y-axis) have been
established and an example of such a relationship is shown below
Circles demonstrate the variation in the benthic composition of
duplicate grabs and the envelope of acceptable precision is defined to
take account of this natural variation (88% in EAP, n = 42 stations)
The next plot shows the predicted benthic index for the site Different
scenarios can be undertaken in the model to predict benthic impacts at
different stages of the growing cycle or for different biomass consent
levels.
Further details are available from: chjc@dml.ac.uk
|